crypto.loans

SALT Lending vs Arch Lending

CeFi

Head-to-head comparison · Last verified Jun 24, 2026

SALT Lending or Arch Lending — which is better?
Arch is the better modern loan product for many larger borrowers because its qualified-custody setup and sharper pricing at scale are compelling. SALT is better if you want a longer operating history, fixed-rate familiarity, and a lender that has been in the category since the beginning.

SALT Lending vs Arch Lending at a glance

MetricSALT LendingArch Lending
Score7.5/108.0/10
Borrow APR7.49–10.5%7.25–10.49%
Max LTV70%60%
KYCRequiredRequired
CustodyThird-partyThird-party
Min loan$5K$5K
Max loan——
Proof of reservesNoNo
Loan terms1, 3, or 5 year fixed termsFixed terms (varies by product)
Founded20162023
JurisdictionUnited States (Denver, CO)United States (New York, NY)
Visit SALT LendingVisit Arch Lending

Affiliate disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no cost to you. Rankings are never influenced by affiliate status.

Category winners

  • Track record
    SALT Lending

    SALT has the longer operating history.

  • Custody quality
    Arch Lending

    Arch's Anchorage setup is the stronger custody story.

  • Large-loan pricing
    Arch Lending

    Arch is more compelling as size increases.

  • Best overall
    Arch Lending

    Arch is the sharper product for many serious borrowers.

When to choose SALT Lending

Choose SALT if you care about long operating history, fixed-rate term clarity, and a more established US lending identity. SALT is one of the oldest names in the category, and for borrowers who value a known fixed-rate structure over newer positioning, that matters. It is the more legacy-feeling product, but that is not always a bad thing.

When to choose Arch Lending

Choose Arch if you care about custody quality and pricing competitiveness at meaningful size. Qualified custody through Anchorage gives it a stronger institutional feel, and its rate structure becomes more compelling as loan sizes rise. If you are comparing these two as a serious larger-balance borrower, Arch often looks like the sharper product.

Key differences

SALT wins on history and fixed-term familiarity. Arch wins on qualified custody, modern positioning, and competitive pricing at scale. The difference is less about ideology and more about whether you want legacy trust or newer institutional execution.

Our recommendation

Our recommendation is Arch for larger borrowers who can benefit from the qualified-custody setup and better scaling economics, and SALT for borrowers who want a more established fixed-rate US lender with a longer history.

Visit SALT LendingVisit Arch Lending

Read the full reviews

SALT Lending reviewArch Lending review

Frequently asked questions

Which is more established, SALT or Arch?
SALT by a wide margin.
Which has the stronger custody setup?
Arch.
Who should use SALT?
Borrowers who want a fixed-rate legacy-style US lender.
Who should use Arch?
Larger borrowers who value qualified custody and strong pricing.

Related